Shadow
Slider

My name is Michał Tomczak, I am a lawyer. I believe in the sense of stories showing things from above to capture their meaning. Even here, in the place where we want to introduce ourselves. Maybe especially here.

As a quite young lawyer trainee, I listened to the conversation of senior lawyers in the cafeteria in the court building, at al. Świerczewskiego. There were still times when all courts in Warsaw, including the Supreme Court, were located in this one building, while lawyers had a lot of time between cases.

Naivety and faith


The first law firms associated with my name were established over 30 years ago. Since March 1995, I’ve been creating my own organizational entities related to legal advice working for business. The whole story is marked by two similar but often quite contradictory tendencies: naivety and faith.

Since 1997, we have been creating the history of the Law Firm together with Karolina Kocemba, today a doctor of law and lawyer.

For the first period of at least ten or more years I was conducting business without standards, because I had no standards. Everything was invented from beginning to end. Then came the period of imitation, today I know it was a rather bad idea. Imitation was about large law firms, not about how they work, but about how I thought they worked.

Discovery


And finally, at MBA, I discovered the theory of business and Michael Porter. And I learned that I, Michał Tomczak, do not have to constantly invent a wheel. Well, according to Porter, the essence of success is to provide customers with unique values. From this it follows that the choice of being the greatest and best is as intuitively understandable as it is a completely faulty business idea. Because you can’t be the best for all and everyone.

For me, this means a hard-working and understandable return to the sources, to the beginnings, also to some beginnings of lawyer’s consultancy, from which I cut myself off nervously and ostentatiously.

Your and our uniqueness


This is what the Law Firm is and is to be: we are not an offer for all and for everyone. We are a Law Firm for those who notice and appreciate our special properties and who are not disturbed by our weaknesses, if any. We create a demanding relationship in which we listen and want to be heard. And it’s not about our or your uniqueness, but about the uniqueness of this relationship and this match. If we stop believing in her, we will part in friendship and without regret.

We know the law and its application well – but many others know it. Neither this site, any type of knowledge, nor even any thick book will change the basic meaning of a professional relationship with a lawyer. Especially in times when every lawyer has access to the same knowledge and the client can have access to any lawyer of any choice. The paradox of our time is that this incredible flood of data restores the sense of a personal, tailored, creative relationship with a legal advisor. Logarithms do not yet make decisions in offices or in the courts.

We aim for this office.
We do not believe in the sense of building business relationships in this way.

  • The age of firefighter
    In his youth, as is known, every second boy wants to be a firefighter. Or two out of three. In being a firefighter there is on the one hand a challenge and a risk, clearly defined in meaning and effect. But there is also a feeling and fulfillment of the mission of saving important worldly values ​​and helping others.
    Please read more
  • Reconstruction of the Saski Palace
    Laws like this can be assessed from two independent perspectives. One of them is a purely legal perspective related to the purpose set by the statute. Acts are there to achieve the agreed social goal as effectively as possible.
    Please read more
  • Swiss franc loans cases
    Banks are losing court cases regarding Swiss franc loans, it seems that this is an irreversible trend. Banks did not seek settlements, did not seek general legislative solutions, did not want to pay extra.
    Please read more
  • Unequal Treatment
    Disability is one of the prohibited discriminatory criteria, pursuant to Directive 2007/78. The directive prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability but does not define the concept of disability. This situation obviously creates an area of discontinuity which is normally covered by detailed and very detailed national rules.
    Please read more

Ideas

ANP Newsletter

Blog