There will be no doubt that there will be an economic crisis. It is not known how deep the crisis is because of course it is not known how long it will last. More interestingly, it is not necessarily clear what the real causes of this crisis will be. It sounds confusing, but there will be a crisis and a great dispute around it, which caused it directly and indirectly.
A made-up concept of eternal progress
Modern economists have more and more modern methods, so maybe they can determine that too. The fact that people do not go to the gallery and that they do not buy unnecessary things for the most part (i.e. unnecessary in the traditional sense of the word ‘need’ although necessary in this sense of the word ‘need’ which means need in itself, expectation that needs to be met) probably will matter because the economic idea of Keynes from 90 years ago or almost a century ago is still the main idea of the system we call capitalism (and which is not capitalism in the sense in which it was once used to distinguish it from its alternative, or ” socialism “and something in the middle, which was called the” third way “, which in the end never was). So, creating demand, selling at all costs, as a way to happiness for everyone.
I am not up to date with all momentous concepts, but it seems to me that the continuous increase in demand and consumption in the most logical of ways must be a road to nowhere in relation to the whole world. Increasing demand and thus increasing production, sales, increasing potential, increasing learning achievements, universality, availability, increasing everything, increasing penis, average wage, increasing, growth, development or the only common idea of humanity. I have no faith that the coronavirus will change our thinking on this matter, although this thinking will lead to destruction as a whole humanity, because everyone believes that someone else will solve the problem of humanity.
The percentage of people who have humanity in mind is frighteningly low. I have neighbors who occasionally leave the staircase – there are only two apartments – rubbish. I struggle with them moralistically in such a way that the garbage I take to the room on the level minus one, where everything is elegantly sorted, I have some success, I think they are a bit silly. However, it wasn’t a problem for me that I carried my garbage, but that I saw that all the garbage two of my neighbors put together, they didn’t care about waste segregation at all.
The idea of more and more possesion
The problem is undoubtedly greater for them than for me, because I am 30 years older than them and in principle the end of the world concerns me less than them. Both, she and he, young, pretty, look at the money that I feel sorry for them. It turns out that the dominant concept of possesing more wins the concept of the end of the world because of its littering. This is not so strange, since the Prime Minister Morawiecki explicitly advocates the concept of possesing as more useful to Poles than the concept of the end of the world. Because they have a lot already, talking about the Germans and the others, so they can deal with the end of the world, and we do not have yet, so we can’t.
This is a dangerous concept, which I say with reference to my own experience, and Prime Minister Morawiecki may not have anything else at all. Well, his concept assumes that there is an objective threshold for invasion at which people and nations speak – quite, now we will deal with the end of the world. And that reflection on the subject comes by itself as an exponential function of snuffing.
In this, in my opinion, there is a fat philosophical error in the ontological sense, because reflection never comes alone, you just have to let it come, you have to cause it to come (although there is a stupid phrase that would indicate otherwise, “reflection came to me “). Reflection is the most common effect of calibration. Following the pattern of thinking is more the task of today’s governments than managing the economy, because under normal circumstances, in a system of liberal democracy, capitalism and the European Union, with the expectations of voters and the ease of changing governments, the freedom of economic decisions of governments is, in fact, very small and ends in four, maximum eight years. In contrast, patterns of thinking and behavior, patterns of segregating rubbish and the belief that there are no natural limits to diving – all this should be the main task of responsible political authority.
Free, independent virus and its crown
So I thought in times of thinking anything better, that all other times. Not only because we all have a little more time (I’m not so sure at all), but above all because the plague has shown us all that with all our super-technology, super-science, super-selection to govern – as a world, and maybe especially the world western, liberal, because he finally takes responsibility for the rest, so our world is pollen in the wind, dog shit in the face of such ordinary plague, with apologies to every dog on this Earth who is a brother to me in landedness (priest Szelest explains in “Lead your plow …” to Janina Duszejko that mouring after animals is a sin, she says nothing, but then sets it on fire with the whole church).
I don’t have a clear idea yet – although there are already a few suggestions – how to connect this damn plague with my green ideology, which is summarized by the belief that the world is going to destruction. However, it seems to me that we quite naturally produce things that have never been before in nature and the world. Harari probably notes that no apples, cereals or worse, the chickens we eat today have never existed in this form in nature. Even boars and even honey are different because boars and bees had to adapt and change. So how the hell is it surprising that we created such a virus that lives its own life and does what it wants. This is just one of many by-products of our “making Earth subject,” with greetings to Saint. in memory of priest Szelesta, who convinced Janina Duszejko with this biblical text.
Janina (sorry, she didn’t like that name very much, but I can’t call her by name, because she is too close to me), however, she loved her dogs called daughters so much, because she had such an attitude towards them that it was not crucial for her that they are not only people, but as part of the equalization of justice, she was forced to burn Father Szelest together with the whole church, and it cannot be ruled out that it was the priest who shot his daughter. It was a radical decision, but shouldn’t the prospect of the end of the world be an incentive for some radicalism?
